Back at Christmas, I posted about having purchased a hub
motor in the form of a cheap ceiling fan. That acquisition marked a first
tentative step toward building an experimental scale model of the SMART (Suspended
Multi-axis Automated Rail Transport) PRT platform. I thought an update might be
in order. After great deliberation, I decided that the fan motor would be just
too hard to modify in the way that I wanted. It was a little on the big side
anyway. (1/4 scale) What I opted for instead was to completely start from
scratch. After all, what I really want is an ironless axial flux hub motor and
they don’t make such a beast. Sure, there are a few small “hub motors” out
there, but they are generally of the radial flux design. (Requires too wide of
a wheel) And these days any motor that fits into a wheel’s hub is called a “hub
motor” even though the motor might be stationary instead of turning with the
wheel. Some even have internal gearing, so they are not even one-piece devices.
These variations will only confuse everything and everybody. In the end it
turns out that the same constraints drive both the actual design and the scaled
down version. A taller, skinnier and shorter bogie simply allows a more compact
track. It seemed better to clarify these relationships with a model that is as
faithful to the full scale version as possible. Here is what I have so far,
mounted on a demonstration stand. I’ll dissect it for you in a moment, but
first let me tell you one more reason why I am going to all of the trouble.
Ever see the video of that old tape by Aerospace Corp? That is more than a good primer on PRT. That model is one very cool toy…There are
still thousands of model railroad enthusiasts out there who get great
satisfaction building similar stuff, not to mention robot buffs. Could model “railbots”
(not to be confused with the game) ever gain a following? After all, a working
model of the SMART PRT platform would certainly be equally fun to watch and
vehicle avoidance and routing strategies would offer programmers something
truly challenging to chew on.
Every year they hold competitions to race ridiculously
impractical and expensive solar vehicles across the desert - the only place
where they reliably work - even in the daytime - while teams of enthusiastic
high-school kids build robots that can only push balls around. What if these
people had something a bit more practical to work on? Beyond that, what could
be cooler than a “train set” where the “cars” can go in any direction, even
straight up? And talk about educational! This cross between model railroading
and robotics would be wonderful for our high schools and colleges. How about a
race where the object is to carry full glasses of water through a 3D network
without spilling a drop or touching another vehicle?
In the course of looking
for components, I ran into all kinds of hobbyist robot motors – but no
gearless, direct-drive systems. Maybe there’s a market for such things… perhaps
enough to where I could get some much needed help refining the control
electronics and software, or to where someone might even start offering something
like this in kit form, or even a whole set. I can see it now - Lego Mindstorm's
new “Mobot Racer” kits. Every kid should have one!
I have seen model trains chugging around restaurants and
malls. I’d love to donate a “railbot” set for the cafeteria at Google. That
would get them thinking! I’ll bet they would be delivering food to the tables
in no time. Finally I would add that the I have spent a lot of time considering
ways to make SMART PRT track affordable, and these attributes play out in the
planned 1/6th scale as well. Making homemade track should prove both
easy and very cheap. But making these little guys fast as slot cars yet able to
climb straight up without a bogey body fat with gears takes some slick
conversion of electromagnetic force. Hence my little project.
Here is all you need, propulsion-wise. This is all made with
hand tools and stuff like lamp parts, PVC pipe caps … nothing more exotic than motor
wire and magnets. The shaft and winding assembly (left) is simply sandwiched
between the two magnet arrays (bottom) and capped with the piece shown on top.
Below is the heart of the motor. On the right are bare
windings and on the left I am holding similar windings cast in a polyester
resin disc. I embedded aluminum window screen on both sides, both for strength
and for a heat-sinking purposes. In larger scale production the windings would
be captive in an aluminum disc designed for the purpose. I produced the
windings by taking 24’ (4.2 ohm) lengths of wire and winding them around a spool
(washer/square nut/washer arrangement) spun by a drill… about 6 minutes each.
The basic principle is this. There are 16 windings sandwiched
between 20 rotating magnet sets, which creates 64 positions per revolution
where 4 magnets and 4 electromagnets can align. (They form a cross pattern).
The individual windings are series connected in four cross-shaped groups. For
example, windings at the north, east, south and west positions are connected together
with a single set of leads. The magnets alternate in polarity and so do the
individual winding leads. Sorry – some people will actually WANT these details…
The bottom line is that each winding set can be electrified
to attract nearby magnets and when they reach dead center the winding reverses
and repels that magnet instead. Meanwhile other magnets are at play, attracting
or repelling hard because they are all close to, but not on, their own dead
center positions. Each group of coils reverses polarity 16 times per revolution.
To run the motor (in the most obvious fashion) requires 4 separate, consecutively
timed square waves, so that makes 64 total polarity changes per revolution.
There are probably all kinds of ways to tweak those waveforms for more speed
with less heat… The way I outlined is “full on” for maximum torque. Two
sequenced bipolar stepper motor drivers should run this nicely and enable
micro-stepping, which would both smooth out the wave form and allow the coils a
bit of lower voltage time to cool. Not that I would use necessarily use this
like a stepper motor, although it certainly can be. Since the magnets are of
alternating polarity, a Hall effect sensor place almost anywhere will trigger
20 times per revolution, so servomotor style feedback will be accurate to that (18
degree) fraction of a turn as well, as is. Between these two forms of position
determination and markers in the track, our little bogie will never be lost –
even by fraction of an inch.
Now for the hard part. The analog electronics and software
programming. Unfortunately I’m not trained in either, or this little puppy
would be going through its paces right now. Lately I’m up to my ears in Googled
articles about “H bridges” and transistor saturation. At least I have plenty of
holding torque and I’m continuing my education!