Open PRT specification project

Rethinking Personal Rapid Transit Design

Sunday, March 20, 2011

120> Back to the Drawing Board

›
Well, it is “back to the drawing board.” In the course of the continuing debate about dual mode I have started to lean more and more toward ...
6 comments:
Sunday, March 6, 2011

119> Further Thoughts on Dual Mode

›
I want to express a few more thoughts on the subject that I raised in the last post, that being using something along the lines of the EN-V ...
14 comments:
Saturday, February 19, 2011

118> GM and Segway’s Unintentional Dual Mode Platform

›
As many of you know, I have never been a big fan of dual mode.  The problem is simple.  If a vehicle is light enough to be part of an effec...
33 comments:
Saturday, February 5, 2011

117> Snow Day Musings

›
Well, we’re having a snow day in Houston…Well not really a snow day, actually it is an ice day. The buses are not running. Everyone is be...
9 comments:
Monday, January 24, 2011

116> Parkin' On the Hill...

›
This post is in response to comments made regarding the last one. In order to illustrate my points, I have used a modified version of the fo...
13 comments:
Thursday, January 20, 2011

115> Swing Low, Sweet PRT...

›
Sometimes a technology pops up out of the blue that unexpectedly solves stumbling blocks that have been around for years. In this case I wil...
22 comments:
Sunday, January 9, 2011

114> In Search of a Cheap Lunch

›
One of the dirty little secrets of “green” electric cars is that the batteries have consumed a lot of energy and created considerable greenh...
19 comments:
Friday, December 31, 2010

113> 2010 – Historic!

›
It has been said, “History is written by the victors.” Well it appears that the victor, in the war of competing PRT standards, is the ULTra/...
24 comments:
Wednesday, December 22, 2010

112> Interview with Santa

›
  This just in!… After persistent rumors of a historic PRT deployment above the Artic circle, intrepid reporter Dan the Blogger goes to the...
Friday, December 10, 2010

111> Capacity

›
For some time now I have advocated designing PRT for more than strictly CBD (Central Business District) use. Even though the “flight to the...
27 comments:
Saturday, November 27, 2010

110> Google's Robocars

›
First this note; I have recently been informed that this blog has twice triggered a virus alert for one reader. Has anyone other than this o...
11 comments:
Thursday, November 18, 2010

109. Harnessing "Anti-Gravity" for PRT Control

›
Recently astute reader Ken MacLeod suggested that we consider certain computer-generated steering behaviors for merging PRT vehicles, and i...
Friday, November 5, 2010

108> Putting a Foot Down for PRT

›
Here is omething to think about…  As I have previously pointed out, because of the boom in highway projects started in the 50’s, cities in...
9 comments:
Sunday, October 24, 2010

107> An App for that.

›
In the world of TCP/IP, and even Ethernet, and especially any wireless version of either, there are transmission delays that limit what s...
4 comments:
Monday, October 18, 2010

106> Simple Circuits

›
For those of you expecting, from the last post, for me to explain my method of requiring only a byte-sized communications to perform a merge...
4 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.